SmartCarb® vs Lectron®
How do they compare?
We get this question a lot. Both the SmartCarb® carburetor (SmartCarb®) and the Lectron® carburetor use metering rods in lieu of jets and needles, and both manufacturers make similar claims in terms of performance, air density compensation, and ease of use. Understanding how they compare is the first step to making an informed decision on which one is right for you. In this article we’ll cover a bit of the history of both products and then provide an objective comparison.
Disclosure: Lectron® is a registered trademark of Lectron, LLC and is used herein without permission. Lectron, LLC and Lectron® carburetors are not, and have never been, affiliated with SmartCarb Fuel Systems, Inc or the SmartCarb® brand of products.
Same original inventor, same concept, same thing… right?
Nope! While both carbs use a metering rod and a flat slide to provide precise air/fuel mixture control and superior fuel atomization to that of conventional needle and jet carburetors, there are more differences between the two than are readily apparent.
Always looking to do things better, Red, and more recently SmartCarb Fuel Systems, have evolved the metering rod carburetor concept over time by adding improvements and features to enhance the basic operating principles of the technology while also addressing the shortfalls and limitations of prior designs. The result is a fuel system that is substantially different from its predecessors, including the Lectron® carburetor.
Like most conventional carburetors, the Lectron® carburetor uses a circular venturi shape. The SmartCarb® does not. Instead, it uses a patented “inverted egg” or “keyhole” venturi shape. The thinking here is not unlike what backyard mechanics have been doing for years by oval/offset boring conventional carburetors – that is to change the rate of throttle opening through the throttle range. SmartCarb Fuel Systems takes it further by algorithmically determining optimum venturi shape, size, and throttle rate for various applications, taking into account a number of engine-related variables.
There’s more to it when it comes to metering rod carbs like the SmartCarb® and the Lectron® carburetors. Maintaining sufficient air velocity or “signal” at the rod is critically important for fuel pickup and atomization. Any stalling of velocity or weak signal at the metering rod can result in a loss of fuel pickup and poor atomization, translating into hesitation, bogging, or soft throttle response. The SmartCarb® carburetor’s venturi profile is designed to focus airflow directly at the metering rod through the entire throttle range in order to maximize signal and promote fuel atomization. A circular venturi shape is not optimized for this purpose and as a result is more prone to suffer from weak signal and soft throttle response, particularly down low or just off idle.
Float Bowl Venting
Float bowl style carburetors require float bowl venting to work properly – just ask anyone who has ever had plugged or frozen vent lines. The Lectron® carburetor, like more conventional carbs, vents its float bowl through external vent/overflow hoses that hang down in front of the rear wheel. The SmartCarb® vents its float bowl quite differently – from inside the airbox via a scoop/port located in the top of the venturi bell.
This patented internal venting feature allows the SmartCarb® to compensate for a wider range of air densities compared to other carburetors. Recent testing proves air/fuel mixture consistency up to a simulated 22,000 feet on drone engine applications, for example.
Venting and airflow communication between the airbox and the float bowl applies a steady, equalized pressure against the fuel in the bowl that is proportional to air density and also velocity inside of the airbox. Put simply, more dense, heavier air drives more fuel flow, less dense air drives less fuel flow, and air/fuel ratios stay consistent regardless of elevation or temperature changes.
Beyond improved air density compensation, internal float bowl venting also provides for sufficient top end fueling in the SmartCarb® without the need for a power jet. Although the original Lectron® carburetor of 1974 did not have a power jet, all modern iterations of the design come with at least one or more power jets to provide additional fuel to the mix from mid to top.
No overflow hoses?
Where does the fuel go in the SmartCarb?
Unless you count the Lectron® carburetor’s power jet as a jet (and it is), both it and the SmartCarb® are jet-less in the traditional sense. That means no more brass to change either way! Adjustments are typically required during initial tuning and to accommodate engine modifications or when changing fuel selection.
The Lectron® carburetor has 3 primary adjustments: the idle set screw, the metering rod position, and the power jet. The SmartCarb® has only two: the idle set screw and metering rod position. Changing the metering rod position in the Lectron® carburetor requires removing the cap and pulling the slide. Lectron® carburetor metering rod adjustments are limited to 4 positions per revolution.
Conversely, changing the position of the metering rod in the SmartCarb® is done externally, by hand, and from the seat of the bike in most cases. The SmartCarb® carburetor’s metering rod can be more finely adjusted with 10 clicks/positions per revolution by shutting the engine off, opening the throttle to wide open, and using the clicker adjuster in the cap. Adjustments take seconds and can be done while the engine and pipe stay up to temp.
The SC2 model SmartCarb® and H-Series Lectron® carburetors are designed for use in modern 2-stroke dirt bikes and similar applications using the Keihin PWK or Mikuni TMX stock, however their build quality and manner of construction differ in a few notable ways that affect their appearance, compatibility, durability, and ease of use.
The cast aluminum H-Series Lectron® carburetor, based on a much older design, presents a few issues when used in modern applications including:
- Longer end-to-end length (.5″/12.5mm longer than the modern Keihin PWK/Mikuni TMX and .25″/6mm longer than the SC2)
- Stock throttle cable incompatibility
- Inconvenient, pipe side choke placement
- No throttle position sensor (TPS) option
- Significant throttle slide wearing over time (replacement required)
All of this means the fit in some bikes can be tricky (for example, Lectron, LLC recommends the use of the shorter XC-W or TE intake flange with the HV or H-Series models when installed into 2017 or later KTMs or Huskies). The stock throttle cable and handset must be replaced with ones provided by Lectron, LLC in most applications and the use of 3D ignition mapping, Beta oil injection, or aftermarket CDIs requiring TPS isn’t an option.
Which one is right for you?
The choice is ultimately up to you. Our hope is that this article sheds some light on the history of these revolutionary fuel systems and that it offers a clear and concise explanation about their differences. Knowledge is power and an informed decision is a smart decision.
Stay tuned for a comparison video coming soon to our new YouTube Channel!